W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2009

Re: ISSUE-59: normative-language-reference FPWD

From: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:58:51 +0100
Message-ID: <4979BF0B.4020607@opera.com>
To: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>

Karl Dubost wrote:
> 
> 
> Le 23 janv. 2009 à 07:05, James Graham a écrit :
>> The markup language spec duplicates material that is already in the 
>> HTML 5 spec. My understanding is that a FPWD puts a document on the 
>> REC track so I presume it would be expected to be a largely normative 
>> document.
> 
> no. A document which is published as first WD can become a W3C Note as 
> well.
> 

Ah, it seems that I did not read the process document closely enough. 
Apologies.

As I previously said, if the intent is to end up with a non-normative 
document, I do not have general objections to publishing (although I may 
have specific comments on the document itself of course). Otherwise, my 
previous points stand.
Received on Friday, 23 January 2009 12:57:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:00 UTC