W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2009

Re: Proposed amends to <small> element

From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:24:09 +0100
Message-ID: <4975A649.3050201@disruptive-innovations.com>
To: Bruce Lawson <brucel@opera.com>
Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Ben Millard <cerbera@projectcerbera.com>, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org> 

Just my two eurocents here : making an element, small in our case, have
both inline and block behaviors depending on its content model is a
nightmare for wysiwyg content editors. I've said it many times about
ins and del.

I sincerely do not understand why small is preserved in HTML 5. From my
perspective, it can rest in peace.

</Daniel>
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2009 10:24:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:41 UTC