W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2009

Re: Proposed amends to <small> element

From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:24:09 +0100
Message-ID: <4975A649.3050201@disruptive-innovations.com>
To: Bruce Lawson <brucel@opera.com>
Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Ben Millard <cerbera@projectcerbera.com>, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>


Just my two eurocents here : making an element, small in our case, have
both inline and block behaviors depending on its content model is a
nightmare for wysiwyg content editors. I've said it many times about
ins and del.

I sincerely do not understand why small is preserved in HTML 5. From my
perspective, it can rest in peace.

</Daniel>

Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2009 10:24:50 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org: "[Bug 6457] New: registerContentHandler() and sniffing"
Previous message: Anne van Kesteren: "Re: ACTION-78: Suggestion text for 1.5.4"
In reply to: Bruce Lawson: "Re: Proposed amends to <small> element"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:28 GMT