W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2009

Re: ACTION-96: Origin removal

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:28:32 +0000 (UTC)
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, Sam Ruby <rubys@us.ibm.com>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0901200126190.29785@hixie.dreamhostps.com>


(Back on public-html since this is about changes to the spec.)

On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Dan Connolly wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 17:01 +0100, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
> [...]
> > I suggest simply marking it with a big-issue note stating that the 
> > section is intended to be removed pending its inclusion in an 
> > alternative spec.
> 
> Yes, I like that idea; please do that, Ian.

I'm very confused. Which section are we talking about removing?


> While you're at it, feel free to note the 2 possibilities Henri outlined 
> in his message of Mon, 19 Jan 2009 01:33:27 +0200.

Could you elaborate on which section you think should get a note, and what 
the note should say? I'm very confused here.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2009 01:29:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:28 GMT