On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:31:24 +0100, Sam Ruby <rubys@us.ibm.com> wrote: > That would be acceptable to me. Which reminds me, are there plans for > refreshing the HTMLWG draft[1], along with an associated publication note > [2]? I asked about that a few times and it seems we did not have resources to update the pubnotes document. I volunteered doing an update to html5-diff including updating section 5 to be against the June 10 draft during one of the telcons on IRC, but nothing concrete came forth out of that. > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-html5-20080610/ > [2] http://dev.w3.org/html5/pubnotes/ -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Monday, 19 January 2009 12:38:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:25 GMT