W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2009

Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:18:18 +0100
Message-ID: <497212DA.7030503@gmx.de>
To: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@us.ibm.com>, Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>

James Graham wrote:
> ...
>> 2) DOCTYPE with an optional null quoted string
> 
> I can live with this but it seems suboptimal since the differences 
> between this and <!doctype html> and the longer form are not 
> self-descriptive.
> ...

There is no difference, so from this p.o.v. an empty string is just 
fine. Anything else indeed suggests that there is a difference.

> ...

BR, Julian
Received on Saturday, 17 January 2009 17:19:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:28 GMT