Re: ISSUE-54: doctype-legacy-compat

Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
 > ...
>> First, we have an editor who did not participate in yesterday's call, 
>> nor in the call the week before it, has chosen to Warnock[1] this 
>> thread, has indicated that he does not and will not follow 
>> consensus[2], and doesn't carry tracker items[3].
>>
> I would not expect Ian to object to the change proposed above, but since 
> it amounts to minor aesthetic fiddling, I would not expect it to get 
> high priority. I would not even think it particularly reasonable for the 
> chairs to ask him to make this issue his top priority, given its 
> relative importance.
 > ...

Well, the best way to waste even more time and energy on stuff like this 
is not to resolve it.

BR, Julian