Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > ... >> First, we have an editor who did not participate in yesterday's call, >> nor in the call the week before it, has chosen to Warnock[1] this >> thread, has indicated that he does not and will not follow >> consensus[2], and doesn't carry tracker items[3]. >> > I would not expect Ian to object to the change proposed above, but since > it amounts to minor aesthetic fiddling, I would not expect it to get > high priority. I would not even think it particularly reasonable for the > chairs to ask him to make this issue his top priority, given its > relative importance. > ... Well, the best way to waste even more time and energy on stuff like this is not to resolve it. BR, JulianReceived on Saturday, 17 January 2009 17:08:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:25:26 UTC