W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2009

Re: The war of the worlds: HTML vs. RDF

From: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:07:44 +0100
Cc: public-html@w3.org
Message-Id: <A295F523-0220-424D-B300-B36D7A218C45@la-grange.net>
To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>


Le 11 janv. 2009 à 00:48, Cameron McCormack a écrit :
> Note that conforming XHTML 1.0 documents must have one of the three
> XHTML 1.0 doctypes:
>
>  http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#strict


Not exactly. That is part of the ambiguities of XHTML 1.0 unfortunately.
What you outlined is defined as "strict conformance", the other types  
of Conformance are left undefined.

Toby talked about XHTML (aka XHTML family)

Le 10 janv. 2009 à 17:44, Toby A Inkster a écrit :
> (particularly as XHTML does not require a DOCTYPE, so there is no  
> easy way of differentiating between XHTML5 and earlier versions of  
> XHTML) but still doable.


There is a tutorial for creating languages being part of the XHTML  
Family but not necessary easy to use. These are more dedicated for  
companies with very specific needs.
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Guide/xhtml-m12n-tutorial/
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/

Note that XHTML Modularization is not really clear as well. :) It  
doesn't really mandate to have a doctype or schema *in* the document.
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/conformance.html#s_conform_document


-- 
Karl Dubost
Montréal, QC, Canada
Received on Sunday, 11 January 2009 08:08:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:00 UTC