W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2009

Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:33:40 -0500
Message-ID: <49677C64.6060904@mit.edu>
To: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Christian Schmidt <w3.org@chsc.dk>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>


Laurens Holst wrote:
> Both Mozilla and the currently specced behaviour special-case this for 
> empty src attributes only, which I guess is slightly better than 
> applying this generically, so that there is at least a workaround.

Right.  The idea was to allow the use case you describe with JPEG if you 
  really do want to do it...

-Boris

Received on Friday, 9 January 2009 16:34:32 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Boris Zbarsky: "Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI"
Previous message: Simon Pieters: "IE compat with coords parsing"
In reply to: Laurens Holst: "Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI"
Next in thread: Boris Zbarsky: "Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:25 GMT