W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2009

Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI

From: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:30:11 +0100
Message-ID: <49672733.9050107@students.cs.uu.nl>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
CC: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, Christian Schmidt <w3.org@chsc.dk>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Laurens Holst schreef:
>>> 2)  In practice no one does that.
>>> 3)  In practice sites somewhat commonly have <img src="">.  We (Gecko)
>>>     have had 28 independent bug reports filed (with people bothering to
>>>     create an account in the bug database, etc) about the behavior
>>>     difference from IE here.  That's a much larger number of bug 
>
> Let me just make this clear before this turns into a misconception 
> about legacy IE compatibility:
>
> The currently described behaviour is NOT the same as IE.
>
> IE treats <img src=""> as <img src=".">. 

In case you want to verify this, my testcases:

http://www.grauw.nl/test/test_imgsrc.html
http://www.grauw.nl/test/test_imgsrc_base.html

Use Fiddler to see the requests.

~Laurens

-- 
Note: New email address! Please update your address book.

~~ Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san nan da!! ~~
Laurens Holst, student, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com



Received on Friday, 9 January 2009 10:30:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:28 GMT