W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2009

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:11:33 -0500
Message-ID: <49A9B695.5010909@intertwingly.net>
To: Rob Sayre <rsayre@mozilla.com>
CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, public-xhtml2@w3.org, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
Rob Sayre wrote:
> On 2/27/09 6:07 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> Hi Noah,
>>
>> It seems to me that indeed the TAG should be actively involved, since 
>> the primary issue here is about architectural coordination.
> 
> Many have suggested that the HTML WG work on a less ambitious initial 
> deliverable, and establish a pattern of quick iteration. This thread 
> shows that it might not make sense to gate HTML interoperability efforts 
> on XHTML coordination. I am not suggesting giving up on coordination, 
> but I do think some issues will need the amount of time Ian has 
> estimated for his document.
> 
> You can Solve Any Problem... if you're willing to make the problem small 
> enough,

What concerns me more than coordination costs is that RDFa in text/html 
is proceeding:

http://rdfa.info/wiki/RDFainHTML4
http://esw.w3.org/topic/RDFa#head-681001ee6c73e87bd692e29693b3904e462fd9f2
http://www.w3.org/Submission/2008/SUBM-ccREL-20080501/
http://www.whitehouse.gov/

- Sam Ruby
Received on Saturday, 28 February 2009 22:12:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:01 UTC