W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2009

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel

From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 08:52:59 -0800
Message-ID: <49A96BEB.1080702@adida.net>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, public-xhtml2@w3.org, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
Julian Reschke wrote:
> The Link Header draft proposes a single new registry (containing
> existing HTML and Atom relations) -- so no, this doesn't seem to be a
> problem.

Julian,

The registry doesn't/cannot change prior specs which specify that
@profile affects the value of @rel.

-Ben
Received on Saturday, 28 February 2009 16:53:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:32 GMT