Ian Hickson wrote: > On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Julian Reschke wrote: >> David Poehlman wrote: >>> hmm, I like #2 but I would ad that it is my contention that we don't break >>> backwards compatibility. >>> ... >> Indeed. >> >> Come up with something better, and *deprecate* the old feature in order to >> make the transition. > > That's in fact exactly what HTML5 does today. Nope. A document using @summary would need to be valid.Received on Friday, 27 February 2009 08:37:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:28 GMT