David Poehlman wrote: > in that event, it can be ignored I will neither ignore nor put up with such statements. > On Feb 25, 2009, at 9:20 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > Robert J Burns wrote: >> I say malicious since the continued repetition of the fallacious >> arguments seem directed at ensuring such information is not made >> available to visually and cognitively disabled users. > > The above statement is neither productive nor acceptable. > > - Sam Ruby - Sam RubyReceived on Wednesday, 25 February 2009 15:30:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:42 UTC