- From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:24:14 -0500
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: Robert J Burns <rob@robburns.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>, Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>, Steve Axthelm <steveax@pobox.com>, Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, HTMLWG <public-html@w3.org>, wai-xtech@w3.org, wai-liaison@w3.org, janina@rednote.net, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Matt Morgan-May <mattmay@adobe.com>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>
in that event, it can be ignored, however, one does wonder why the resistance to something so obviously benefitial is so *strong*. On Feb 25, 2009, at 9:20 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: Robert J Burns wrote: > I say malicious since the continued repetition of the fallacious > arguments seem directed at ensuring such information is not made > available to visually and cognitively disabled users. The above statement is neither productive nor acceptable. - Sam Ruby -- Jonnie Appleseed with his Hands-On Technolog(eye)s reducing technology's disabilities one byte at a time
Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2009 15:25:08 UTC