- From: Olivier GENDRIN <olivier.gendrin@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:37:50 +0100
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: public-html <public-html@w3.org>
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:33:30 +0900, Olivier GENDRIN > <olivier.gendrin@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Looking at r2866 [1], I note the sentence "primarily using CSS >> positioning and CSS tables." I think that it would be less confusing >> to talk about CSS display instead of CSS tables (and more accurate >> from a CSS spec point of view [2][3]). >> >> [1] http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=2865&to=2866 >> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/visuren.html#display-prop >> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/visuren.html#positioning-scheme > > CSS tables will likely be a separate CSS module in due course. It's also how > people all over the place refer to it so for a non-normative note it makes > perfect sense to me. Many thanks Anne, I missed that point [1]. But from a pedagogical point of view, wouldn't it be better to have a broader encouragement on display instead of 'just' table display ? (not sure that my sentence makes sense in English) [1] http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/current-work#tables -- Olivier G. http://twitter.com/lespacedunmatin http://www.lespacedunmatin.info/blog/
Received on Tuesday, 24 February 2009 11:38:26 UTC