W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2009

Re: ISSUE-54 doctype-legacy-compat, was: Input on the agenda

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:00:23 -0600
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-html@w3.org
Message-Id: <1235415623.7466.2759.camel@pav.lan>
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 14:17 +0100, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Ian Hickson wrote:
> > ...
> > ISSUE-54 (doctype-legacy-compat): tools that can't generate <!DOCTYPE 
> > html>
> > 
> >    It's not clear to me what needs changing in the spec for these issues. 
> >    For all three, the spec seems detailed and I am not aware of any 
> >    actual problems having been raised and not yet addressed.
> > ...
> 
> Apparently this is because the spec changed, but the issue hasn't been 
> updated.

I updated it to PENDING REVIEW based on chatting with the chairs:
2009-02-19 04:50:12: updating to pending review, since we seem to have
consensus around the 30 Jan proposal [Dan Connolly]
 -- http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/54

reminder, for reference:

"PENDINGREVIEW = An Editor has reviewed arguments and edited spec to
taste, or the WG chairs have evaluated the level of consensus and
identified one or more proposals that would resolve the issue."
 -- http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML

I think we can close this issue as soon as the scheme is registered...

ACTION-103 on Lachlan Hunt: track registration of about: URI scheme -
due 2009-03-05 - open

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 23 February 2009 19:00:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:01 UTC