W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2009

Re: [whatwg] The <iframe> element and sandboxing ideas

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 23:21:24 +0000 (UTC)
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Cc: HTMLWG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0902172320330.6209@hixie.dreamhostps.com>
On Wed, 28 May 2008, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> > > There's a big difference to that and to what I'm proposing. With 
> > > what's in bug 80713 you're still limited to a box that basically 
> > > doesn't take part of the outer page at all. For example in the table 
> > > example in my original post the headers of the table would not 
> > > resize to fit the column sizes in the <include>ed table.
> > 
> > Woah. That's far more radical. I have no idea how to do that. [...]
>
> [...]
> 
> I'm still intending to do some testing with this idea once I get more 
> time. A lot of the implementation details have to be solved for XBL 
> anyway.

I would be interested in your implementation experience on this front if 
you do experiment with this.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 17 February 2009 23:22:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:01 UTC