W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2009

Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong"

From: Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:02:19 +0900
Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-Id: <6C13B6B4-C382-47A2-9A8F-3B145F016166@la-grange.net>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>

Le 17 févr. 2009 à 09:31, Larry Masinter a écrit :
> So I'm unclear how those references add any light.

Maybe looking at the implementation landscape helps understand. Having  
written the following email, I'm not sure it adds any light either. :)

In abstract counpound languages use a namespace for xhtml fragments  
which identify a specification "Modularization of XHTML", which is not  
used (?) by some products relying on rendering engine libraries. But  
not sure it matters.

[…]

> Both XMPP/Jabber and Atom define which version of which  
> specifications they make reference to in their specifications. Both  
> could choose to update their references to XHTML5, to XHTML2, or to  
> both (selected by some versioning mechanism either endorsed by W3C  
> or independently invented by their embedding contexts), or to  
> neither (leaving both at XHTML 1.0).

For example on Mac OS X (Maciej will correct me if I'm wrong), The  
same [Core Engine: Webkit][1] for rendering XHTML across is used  
across applications. So NetNewsWire (atom feed reader) is using Webkit  
to render/process the xhtml content of an atom feed.

* Webkit is used in Adobe AIR. There are many feed readers developed  
with AIR.
* Presto (Opera) is/was? used in Adobe Creative Suite version 2 at  
least, but I don't know if there are processing any atom feed, or  
XHTML fragments.
* Gecko is used I guess in Thunderbird for feed reading (David Baron  
will correct me) and there are add-ons for RSS feeds in Firefox.


Modularization of XHTML gives a technique to create vocabulary reusing  
part of XHTML. This is under the control of XHTML 2 WG will a  
different development path of vocabularies.
HTML 5 has a section on [parsing XHTML Fragments][2] and if I  
understood look at the namespace.





[1]: http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/Applications%20using%20WebKit
[2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/the-xhtml-syntax.html#parsing-xhtml-fragments


-- 
Karl Dubost
Montréal, QC, Canada
http://twitter.com/karlpro
Received on Tuesday, 17 February 2009 01:02:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:01 UTC