- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:05:49 +0100
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Larry Masinter wrote: > ... > The fact that some software implements something (table summaries or > header profiles, for example) hasn't been given as strong a weight > in this group as the actual practice in real documents on the web. > Is there actually any significant deployment of real web content that > uses XHTML namespace elements in arbitrary XML compound documents? > ... The Atom feed format (RFC 4287), for instance. > ... > As an aternative, we could ask that, if XHTML2 keeps the same > namespace as XHTML1 and XHTML5, that all XHTML2 fragments be > identified by wrapping them in an <xhtml2> element. We could > require that HTML user agents that do not support XHTML2 not > attempt to interpret <xhtml2>-wrapped content any more than > they would attempt to treat SVG content as HTML. > ... We could do that, and it would probably work, I just don't see the XHTML2 WG agreeing to that. > ... BR, Julian
Received on Monday, 16 February 2009 21:06:56 UTC