Re: details on report of PFWG HTML5 actions & issues status

On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:29:14 +0100, Gregory J. Rosmaita <oedipus@hicom.net> wrote:

> 2. @summary:
>
>    PF WG already made an official announcement on this issue and
>    requested the attribute be re-instated, consult:
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Aug/0213.html
>
>    PF WG's position from the outset has been that there is a need to
>    restore @summary for TABLE in the draft specification BEFORE the
>    next public working draft is issued -- janina sajka, chair of PFWG
>    will probably say so formally in the near future in a post to
>    public-html

Wait, are you saying that the PFWG formally objects to the lack of summary="" in HTML5 as to prevent publishing another Working Draft?

BTW, HTML5 was published as a WD yesterday and I suspect the next target is Last Call (in October).

-- 
Simon Pieters
Opera Software

Received on Friday, 13 February 2009 06:07:58 UTC