W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2009

Re: revised table headers design is OK, right?

From: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:02:28 +0100
Message-ID: <499401C4.7060506@opera.com>
To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
CC: public-html@w3.org

Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:46:43 +0100, James Graham <jgraham@opera.com> wrote:
> 
>>
>> Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>>> Trying to step through it for half an hour did my head in at this 
>>> time of day, and I couldn't easily print out the relevant bit so I 
>>> could set myself up with enough registers to be a computer. So 
>>> instead, can anyone explain what are the headers for the cell whose 
>>> content is "cell 2 2" in the attached table?
>>
>> The table inspector says "Australia Melbourne Buses Red" [1], but I 
>> make no promises whatsoever about it being bug free.
> 
> OK, that was what I hoped it would be, but my attempts to read the 
> algorithm in the spec didn't come out like that. Can anyone confirm or 
> deny that the implementation is doing what the algorithm suggests?

I should also note bug 6438 [1] which may affect your results.


[1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6438
Received on Thursday, 12 February 2009 11:02:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:01 UTC