- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:18:04 -0700
- To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Hi, Folks- Charles McCathieNevile wrote (on 2/11/09 1:13 AM): > > Actually, I think Ian's machine-checkable exceptions are reasonable > candidates for "conformant". I am talking about the infamous case where > nobody who knows has said anything about what the alt should be, in > which case there should not be some made-up text, simply a missing alt > attribute and this should be recommended against - explicitly identified > as a problem (but one that stuffing some dummy text in will only > aggravate). FWIW, I also think the machine-checkable exceptions are a good idea, as a disambiguator. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
Received on Thursday, 12 February 2009 00:18:13 UTC