W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2009

Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong"

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:50:17 +0100
Message-ID: <49932BF9.8010309@gmx.de>
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
CC: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, plh@w3.org

Jonas Sicking wrote:
> ...
> Agreed on both accounts.
> However there is definitely an issue to solve, and that is how to
> solve the fact that both the HTML WG and the XHTML2 WG are defining
> next versions of XHTML1.1. And doing so in incompatible ways (i.e.
> neither spec is a strict superset of the other).
> ...

There's the additional issue of the XMTML2 WG and Semantic Web 
Deployment WG redefining the meaning of @rel in XHTML 1 (when used with 
RDFa) -- so it's not exclusively an XHTML2 vocabulary issue.

BR, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2009 19:51:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:42 UTC