Re: What's the problem? "Reuse of 1998 XHTML namespace is potentially misleading/wrong"

Jonas Sicking wrote:
> ...
> Agreed on both accounts.
> 
> However there is definitely an issue to solve, and that is how to
> solve the fact that both the HTML WG and the XHTML2 WG are defining
> next versions of XHTML1.1. And doing so in incompatible ways (i.e.
> neither spec is a strict superset of the other).
> ...

There's the additional issue of the XMTML2 WG and Semantic Web 
Deployment WG redefining the meaning of @rel in XHTML 1 (when used with 
RDFa) -- so it's not exclusively an XHTML2 vocabulary issue.

BR, Julian