- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:29:18 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Cc: public-html <public-html@w3.org>
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Simon Pieters wrote: > > We implemented HTML5's parsing rules for coords=''. Hence I was > interested in checking if the algorithm is compatible with IE, so I > implemented it in javascript: > > http://simon.html5.org/tools/js/coords-parsing.html > > I found that HTML5 didn't quite match IE. For instance "1,2:3,4" gives > "1" in HTML5 but "1,2,4" in IE (i.e. IE gives ':' the same treatment > that the spec gives to '.'). > > So I wondered which characters other than ':' that IE treated this way: > > http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/?%3C!DOCTYPE%20html%3E%0D%0A%3Cmap%3E%3Carea%20shape%3D%22circle%22%3E%3C%2Fmap%3E%0D%0A%3Cscript%3E%0D%0Avar%20a%20%3D%20document.getElementsByTagName('area')%5B0%5D%3B%0D%0Afor%20(var%20i%20%3D%201%3 > B%20i%20%3C%200x3ff%3B%20%2B%2Bi)%20%7B%0D%0A%20%20a.coords%20%3D%20'1'%20%2B%20String.fromCharCode(i)%20%2B%20'2%2C3'%3B%0D%0A%20%20w('0x'%20%2B%20i.toString(16)%20%2B%20'%20('%20%2B%20String.fromCharCode(i)%20%2B%20')%3A%20'%20%2B%20a.coords)%3B%0D%0A%7 > D%0D%0A%3C%2Fscript%3E > > ...and it turns out to be quite a few (all lines that say "1,3,0"). Yeah, the spec actually has a precise list in comments. It actually varies across different versions of IE, too. > Then I asked Philip` for a some data, and he kindly gave a list: > > http://philip.html5.org/data/coords-with-unusual-chars.txt > > ...from which I found three pages that would break with HTML5: > > http://www.psu.edu/ur/GSpanier/gallery/ > coords="157,5,233,20' href=" (apostrophe) > > http://www.motorsportforbundet.no/ > coords="615, 0, 768, 40 " (tab) > > http://www.kipwmi.com/ > coords="2,20', 87,38'" (apostrophe) > > It's possible that there are similar pages that contain > coords='1,2",3,4"' or coords=1,2',3,4', but Philip` only looked at > double-quoted attributes. > > > On one hand it seems reasonable to say that 3 pages out of 130k isn't a > big deal, but OTOH those pages work in today's browsers and changing the > algorithm to fix them is simple. > > Doing exactly what IE does might not be necessary for Web compat. IE > gives different treatment to various non-ASCII characters (such as 0x3f3 > and 0x3f4). > > For the time being we'll keep the HTML5 implementation but we might > change to be more compatible. I've made the spec more compatible with IE for ASCII characters. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2009 10:30:19 UTC