W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2009

Re: simple shorthand syntax proposal

From: Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 15:14:56 +0000
Message-ID: <498B0270.70305@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
CC: public-html@w3.org

Ah, thank you Lachlan : I had indeed
missed six of the nine.  In the light
of the later comments, I can see that
there is a basis for concern, although
(like Andrew) I am concerned that we use
"backward(s) compatible" to mean a number
of different things.

Philip TAYLOR
--------
Lachlan Hunt wrote:

 > The threading appears to be broken in the list archive, so you may have
 > missed some if you didn't look hard enough. There's 9 emails in the
 > thread in November and 5 in December, including objections from several
 > others.
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2009 15:16:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:29 GMT