- From: Rob Sayre <rsayre@mozilla.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:23:47 -0800
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- CC: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 2/5/09 12:13 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote: > On Feb 5, 2009, at 10:04, Rob Sayre wrote: > >> Leaving it in is no worse than the status quo, it would be hard to >> claim that it's been a source of incompatibilities, and other specs >> depend on it. >> >> Hardly seems worth debating, to be honest. > > > Should also <font> be conforming in HTML5? > Yes, to the extent that it is interoperable. IMHO. I have no idea which attribute values for the element are recognized by each major implementation, for example. Of course, leaving this unspecified is no worse than the status quo. I probably sound like a broken record. :) - Rob
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2009 08:24:31 UTC