W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2009

Re: Spec license

From: Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 21:56:11 +0000
Message-ID: <4988BD7B.8030704@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
CC: Robert J Burns <rob@robburns.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>

Sorry, I don't understand, David :

L. David Baron wrote:

> Depending on this point, however, is somewhat problematic, since it
> means that we can't split out parts of the spec and give them to a
> different editor 

I understand what you are saying up to this point
(even if I don't follow your logic, but that
almost certainly depends on what follows) ...

> who doesn't independently publish under a different
> license.

but I don't understand this second part at all.

Philip TAYLOR
Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2009 21:56:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:29 GMT