- From: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
- Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 02:59:47 +0100
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, public-html <public-html@w3.org>
Maciej Stachowiak 2009-01-31 22.55: > On Jan 31, 2009, at 5:30 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: >> Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >>> The W3C's HTML WG has the following decision policy: [...] >> With those caveats in place, here goes: > > I don't think your description is in conflict with what I stated. The > one part I disagree with is that any raised issue that at least three > people agree is an issue must be flagged in Working Drafts. I do think > it is often a good idea to mark especially controversial issues, or > especially pervasive and clearly unresolved issues, but I think doing > this as a matter of course may create a lot of work. I would say instead > that we should exercise reasonable judgment about when a flag in the > draft is warranted. Stating his disagreement. (Conditionally permitted by Sam.) > P.S. I know you asked people not to state their agreement on the list. > But since your email was a reply to me, but since your email was a reply > to me and since I think it is helpful to the group to see people coming > to agreement, I chose to make an exception. Claiming to have stated his agreement. Sam: > Keep a watch out for these three, and call them out when you see them. I see a "strawman". -- leif halvard silli
Received on Sunday, 1 February 2009 02:00:32 UTC