W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2009

Re: Decision Policy [was: Intended Audience]

From: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 02:59:47 +0100
Message-ID: <49850213.5050609@malform.no>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, public-html <public-html@w3.org>

Maciej Stachowiak 2009-01-31 22.55:
> On Jan 31, 2009, at 5:30 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>> The W3C's HTML WG has the following decision policy:
>> With those caveats in place, here goes:
> I don't think your description is in conflict with what I stated. The 
> one part I disagree with is that any raised issue that at least three 
> people agree is an issue must be flagged in Working Drafts. I do think 
> it is often a good idea to mark especially controversial issues, or 
> especially pervasive and clearly unresolved issues, but I think doing 
> this as a matter of course may create a lot of work. I would say instead 
> that we should exercise reasonable judgment about when a flag in the 
> draft is warranted.

Stating his disagreement. (Conditionally permitted by Sam.)

> P.S. I know you asked people not to state their agreement on the list. 
> But since your email was a reply to me, but since your email was a reply 
> to me and since I think it is helpful to the group to see people coming 
> to agreement, I chose to make an exception.

Claiming to have stated his agreement.

> Keep a watch out for these three, and call them out when you see them.

I see a "strawman".
leif halvard silli
Received on Sunday, 1 February 2009 02:00:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:42 UTC