W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2009

Re: author view of HTML 5 spec - static copy (2nd try)

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:26:38 +0000 (UTC)
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0908261822180.13785@hixie.dreamhostps.com>
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009, Dan Connolly wrote:
> 
> I don't think we've managed to make it available in the w3.org versions 
> to date, plus it takes some heavy CSS lifting in the browser.

I think the W3C versions have it; it's just an alternative style sheet, 
which can be accessed through your browser's UI.


> So thanks to Geoffrey and James and company, I learned a little bit 
> about the build tools and made a static copy:
> 
> multipage version:
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/multipage/Overview.html
> 
> single page version:
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/multipage/spec.html

The section numbers seem to be different here than in the full spec; while 
I can see that the section numbers being consecutive makes some sense, I 
think that having them differ from other views of the spec is going to 
make feedback very confusing. Is there any chance we can keep the numbers 
in sync between the two copies?


Is there a flag I can pass to the anolis on pimpmyspec.net to autogenerate 
this copy, or should it be added to Mike's post-cvs-checkin stuff like the 
current spec splitter?

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 26 August 2009 18:25:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:44 GMT