W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2009

Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 04:11:30 -0400
Message-ID: <4A939CB2.3050301@intertwingly.net>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
CC: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> 
> On Aug 24, 2009, at 6:37 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> 
>> Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>> On Aug 24, 2009, at 6:25 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>>> Sam Ruby wrote:
>>>>> ...
>>>>> That should be simple.  Is there anybody who is *opposed* to HTML5 
>>>>> describing all elements/attributes of previous specs?
>>>>> Ian indicated that he believes that it does.  You have pointed out 
>>>>> that it does not currently.  If we treat these differences as bugs 
>>>>> (and add a history section, as you and Anne discussed), is this 
>>>>> issue resolved?
>>>>
>>>> Yes!
>>> Add definition of <meta scheme> 
>>> <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7412>
>>> Add definition of <html profile> 
>>> <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7413>
>>> Please add a history section 
>>> <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7414>
>>> I believe the editor intends to take action on all of these. Are any 
>>> other bugs needed?
>>
>> Looks like <a name>:
>>
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Aug/1242.html
> 
> Right now I'm not clear enough on what info Roy thinks should be added 
> to file it as a bug, but I will gladly do so if we can clarify the 
> desired change  through further discussion.

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7422

- Sam Ruby
Received on Tuesday, 25 August 2009 08:12:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:44 GMT