W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2009

Re: Feedback on the current editor's draft

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:44:26 +0200
To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "James Graham" <jgraham@opera.com>
Cc: "Henri Sivonen" <hsivonen@iki.fi>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.uy7g0cqe64w2qv@annevk-t60>
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 01:38:42 +0200, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
> I haven't removed pubdate="" yet. I don't know what to replace it with:
>
>    <article pubdate="2009-01-13">...</article>
>
> ...becoming:
>
>    <time pubdate datetime="2009-01-13">...</time>
>
> ...doesn't seem like a win.

The common format seems to be to have the date somewhere inline the article so not having to duplicate that information seems like a win to me.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 25 August 2009 06:45:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 10 October 2014 16:24:51 UTC