W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2009

RE: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03

From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:58:01 -0700
To: "julian.reschke@gmx.de" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
CC: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <8B62A039C620904E92F1233570534C9B0118DB8F1DAA@nambx04.corp.adobe.com>
This sounds good. I'd suggsted another option if there wasn't
a resolution between (a) and (b) but this sounds like fixing
up (a), which is fine.

Larry
--
http://larry.masinter.net


-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de] 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 6:25 AM
To: Sam Ruby
Cc: public-html@w3.org WG; Larry Masinter
Subject: Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03

Sam Ruby wrote:
> ...
> That should be simple.  Is there anybody who is *opposed* to HTML5 
> describing all elements/attributes of previous specs?
> 
> Ian indicated that he believes that it does.  You have pointed out that 
> it does not currently.  If we treat these differences as bugs (and add a 
> history section, as you and Anne discussed), is this issue resolved?

Yes!

 > ...

BR, Julian
Received on Monday, 24 August 2009 21:58:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:44 GMT