W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2009

Re: How to track issues that block PR but not Last Call (was Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:35:46 -0500
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1251124546.14124.111261.camel@pav.lan>
On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 21:14 -0700, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
[...]
> I'd like to ask the Chairs and Team Contacts for a their input on how  
> to track issues that should not block Last Call, but should block PR.  
> The need for such a status has become clear not only with this issue,  
> but also with the issue of "about" registration.
> 
> Dan Connolly proposed that issues marked as "Pending Review" can be  
> treated as blocking PR but not LC. I don't think that works, given our  
> current definition of Pending Review, which is that consensus has not  
> yet been assessed (which might well indicate the issue blocks Last  
> Call).
> 
> My proposal, create a new product in the tracker, "HTML5 spec PR".  
> Issues that block PR but not Last Call would be moved to this new  
> product.

That works for me.

>  Once we enter CR, we would merge back to a single set of  
> issues. I would love to hear other suggetions.
> 
> Regards,
> Maciej

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 24 August 2009 14:35:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:44 GMT