W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2009

Re: Please Specify Behavior for @rel="next | prev"

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 01:23:05 -0700
Cc: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-id: <DD8A630F-EFDC-45B5-B07B-36E014261143@apple.com>
To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>

On Aug 23, 2009, at 10:34 AM, Doug Schepers wrote:

>
>> On behalf of Apple: Apple is very likely not willing to follow such  
>> a UI
>> requirement in Safari or MobileSafari.
>
> In the proposal I made, it would be a MAY, or at most a SHOULD, in  
> which case Apple is free to make that decision not to support it.

I'd be fine with a MAY-level option to make some UI use of prev/next.  
But isn't it the case implicitly that browsers MAY provide whatever UI  
affordances they want for various <link rel> values, since the spec  
does not restrict UI requirements? For example, most browsers nowadays  
do have built-in UI for rel="feed". So what difference would it make  
to specifically call out prev/next?

That being said, based on the example of rel="feed" and the example  
you cited of tabbed browsing, it seems like the way to popularize  
particular browser UI changes is to bring your case direct to the  
browser vendors. Believe me that we are all highly susceptible to user  
feedback, especially when a competing product (Opera in this case)  
already has the feature. I can also tell you that at Apple, we have  
not heard customers clamoring for prev/next in the way that they did  
for tabbed browsing or built-in feed support. I bet customer demand  
will make a much bigger difference than a MAY requirement in the spec  
to the teams that work on Safari, IE, Firefox and Chrome.

Regards,
Maciej
Received on Monday, 24 August 2009 08:24:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:44 GMT