hi all, As discussed in yeserdays HTML WG meet [1] (and previously), I was assigned an action, but it does not appear to be in the tracker as yet. I have made a start on a table (matrix?) that shows mapping of HTML 5 elements to ARIA roles and the MSAA API (chosen as an example API) and provides indications of what roles and states should be considered conforming for HTML 5 document authoring purposes. plus notes on why. I ended up creating a document in a format that is quite different from henri's (http://hsivonen.iki.fi/aria-html5-bis/) (mainly because, i found the format difficult to work with). http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/misc/ARIA/html5-elements1.html *PLEASE NOTE* *This is a very early draft, much of the content is missing.* *None of the content has any consensus or has been reviewed by anybody.* *It is subject to complete change.* I am not looking for feedback on any of the document conformance suggestions at this time, what I would appreciate is feedback on the format that the content is in, is it understandable? is it a workable format for providing the detail required? [1] http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/html-wg/20090820#l-405 with regards stevefReceived on Friday, 21 August 2009 11:57:17 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:41 GMT