On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 00:27, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> wrote: > On Aug 20, 2009, at 10:22, Phillips, Addison wrote: > > ... > Ah.... but this data, I'm told, is based on the encoding *after detection* >> by Google's crawler, not on the declaration. >> > > > But does it also exclude pages that have encoding labels? Data about the > frequency of users hitting unlabeled pages in particular encodings is the > interesting this here. At Google, the encoding label is taken only as a weak signal (a small factor in the heuristic detection). It is completely overwhelmed by the byte content analysis. (There are too many unlabeled pages *and mislabeled pages*for the label to be used as is.) Mark
Received on Thursday, 20 August 2009 21:09:39 UTC