Re: Spec with issue markers [was: Re: HTML5-warnings - request to publish as next heartbeat WD] from James Graham on 2009-08-19 (public-html@w3.org from August 2009)

From: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:02:26 +0200
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
CC: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Message-ID: <4A8BBFA2.8010507@opera.com>

Sam Ruby wrote:
> James Graham wrote:
>> At this point it would be useful to get feedback. Is this something 
>> that people believe is worth pursuing? How should the issue to section 
>> map be maintained? Is there some style that would be better for the 
>> status/issue markers?
> 
> 1) I think this looks great!
> 
> 2) Any chance you can include the short name (e.g. "table-summary") 
> either inline or as a title?

Done.

> 3) I would suggest section 3.2.1 for issue 41.  (key being the second 
> sentence of the second paragraph).

Done.

Received on Wednesday, 19 August 2009 09:02:42 UTC