W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2009

Re: role vs aria-role

From: Martin Kliehm <martin.kliehm@namics.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:15:39 +0200
Message-Id: <DFAE9A9D-45A7-4C97-B201-52A109D485A5@namics.com>
To: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On 18.08.2009, at 08:30, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> wrote:

> On Aug 18, 2009, at 08:33, Jim Jewett wrote:
>> Please allow the use of "aria-role" for the purposes currently filled
>> by the "role" attribute in all processing related to aria.
> Too late. Implementations have shipped.
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-xtech/2009Mar/0123.html

Also according to the WAI ARIA spec the attribute's name is "role", an  
"aria-role" does not exist. I agree it's a little inconsistent and has  
historical reasons (originally roles and states & properties were two  
separate specs), but that's how it is implemented and what's in the  
specs. I'm fine with that and don't see much danger for authors.

Received on Tuesday, 18 August 2009 11:16:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:49 UTC