- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:30:05 +0300
- To: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>
On Aug 17, 2009, at 15:36, Steven Faulkner wrote: > * "Authoring tools and markup generators must generate conforming > documents. > what current authoring tools stop the generation of invalid documents? iWeb and BlueGriffon both generate markup that validates (thanks to alt="") on the W3C Validator for the actions I put forward earlier. 1) Create a blank document. 2) Drag an image file into it from the Finder. 3) Save. Neither application prompted me for alt. iWeb reminded me of MobileMe twice. iWeb also reminded me about copyrights, but not about accessibility. BlueGriffon prompted me for page title (I typed "Koli" which is the place where the photo was taken). iWeb output: http://hsivonen.iki.fi/test/iweb-alt/Site/Blank.html BlueGriffon output: http://hsivonen.iki.fi/test/bluegriffon-alt/Koli.html (note that the image file was not automatically copied to the right folder) > how do you see this being enforced in the future? I expect product reviewers and prospective users to throw some test output from an authoring application at a validator and complain on blogs if the result is invalid. In anticipation, authoring application developers will continue to make their apps emit syntax that doesn't trigger error messages on a validator. The notable exception is Dreamweaver which opts for ATAG compliance over HTML validity, but ATAG 2 compliance and HTML5 compliance shouldn't be mutually exclusive for authoring app developers. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Monday, 17 August 2009 13:31:09 UTC