W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2009

Re: Proposal: <content> element

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:25:37 +0200
To: "John Drinkwater" <john@nextraweb.com>
Cc: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.uysu4zrd64w2qv@annevk-t60>
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:10:05 +0200, John Drinkwater <john@nextraweb.com> wrote:
> I like this proposal. I take it that the element would be identical to  
> <section>, but with the clear difference that it *is* a generic  
> container? And with only one content element per document?

I think the other difference would be that it typically does not have a heading. The name should probably be <main> by the way as suggested on #whatwg, to more clearly indicate that there is just one per document, as you say. (I always used <div id="content"> myself :-))

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Monday, 17 August 2009 09:26:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:49 UTC