W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2009

Re: [POLL]: Publish HTML 5 update with or without warnings?

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:26:02 -0700
Message-ID: <63df84f0908111326q55f6fd90w18b878d1278f438@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Ian Hickson<ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>
>>   http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd08/
>
> Voting "yes" on both drafts ends up resulting in an abstain if we only
> publish one draft, so I voted only for one draft, and then wrote in the
> comments that my other vote should be considered a "yes" if we end up
> publishing both drafts.

Ugh, that's an unfortunate effect of the way the poll is currently
formed. I changed my vote to do the same.

Sam: In general I'm confused as to why we have this either-or poll at
all, my impression of your initial proposal regarding how to publish
drafts in the WG was that any draft that had enough contributors would
be published. Or was that only meant to apply to editors drafts and
not drafts published on w3.org/TR ? Or is this different given that
Manus draft contains no technical differences? Sorry, not trying to be
difficult, just trying to understand.

/ Jonas
Received on Tuesday, 11 August 2009 20:26:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 10 October 2014 16:24:50 UTC