- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 16:39:59 -0700
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Aug 5, 2009, at 5:00 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > For the moment, I'm focused on a more near term objective: is this > something good enough for now. So, if you agree with Maciej that > this is good enough for the long term clearly you are OK with it > for now. If you aren't sure, but feel that it addresses the > immediate objection; that;s fine too for my purposes. > > If you feel otherwise, please speak up. I'd like to give people > until Sunday night to do so, otherwise I will assume that this is > the basis for the draft that we are going with. Use of @summary on a table should not result in a warning. There is no justification for a warning in either current or soon-to-be-implemented practice. It is actively harmful to content producers who are producing HTML content *now* to tell them that a warning may be announced if they have the temerity to produce a high-quality summary. That text should be removed until such time as the working group makes an actual decision to warn against use of @summary. ....Roy
Received on Thursday, 6 August 2009 23:40:34 UTC