W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2009

Re: 'loadeddate' inconsistency

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:15:46 +0000 (UTC)
To: Eric Carlson <eric.carlson@apple.com>
Cc: public-html WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0904262015370.10370@hixie.dreamhostps.com>
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Eric Carlson wrote:
> 
>   The spec has two definitions of when to send the 'loadeddate' event.
> Setction 4.8.10.7 says loadeddata is sent the first time readyState is *equal
> to* HAVE_CURRENT_DATA:
> 
>     If the previous ready state was HAVE_METADATA and the new ready state is
> HAVE_CURRENT_DATA ...
> 
> but the entry for 'loadeddata' in the table in 4.8.10.13 says it is sent the
> first time readyState is HAVE_CURRENT_DATA *or greater*:
> 
>     readyState newly increased to HAVE_CURRENT_DATA  or greater for the first
> time
> 
>   I think the later definition makes more sense because it means the event
> will always be fired, even if ready state skips past HAVE_CURRENT_DATA.

Done.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Sunday, 26 April 2009 20:16:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:34 GMT