W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2009

Re: WG review of HTML5

From: Sean Fraser <sean@elementary-group-standards.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:26:16 -0700
Message-ID: <9895.1239218776@elementary-group-standards.com>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: <public-html@w3.org>

>From your blog post as noted,

>On Wed 08/04/09  5:35 AM , Sam Ruby  wrote:
>Additionally, I've written a blog post outlining an approach to dealing 
with a number of issues which have been raised from outside of this 
working group.  [1] I believe what I described there is largely 
consistent with the approach that Rob has suggested.

>- Sam Ruby

>[1] http://intertwingly.net/blog/2009/04/08/HTML-Reunification

would you please clarify this sentence:

"This in no way precludes someone or a group producing a separate best practices guidelines for authors, and if they want to suggest that their version of best practices are in conflict with the recommendations of the User Agent Accessibility Guidelines Working Group, the SVG Working Group, the Semantic Web Deployment Working Group, I wish them luck."

I do not understand this.


Sean Fraser
Received on Friday, 10 April 2009 07:23:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:44 UTC