On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 19:03:54 -0400, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 00:41:57 +0200, Michael A. Puls II > <shadow2531@gmail.com> wrote: >> So, the spec's saying that @id doesn't matter at all for document.foo >> matching for iframe, ever? >> >> document.foo matches <iframe id="foo" name="non-empty"> in IE and Opera >> where the @name value is anything non-empty, not necessarily the same >> value as @id. > > Interesting, that's similar to the <img> case. Maybe the specification > should simply align with IE then. Yeh, just wanted everyone to have a look-see. >> Well, it seems like it's kind of like this: >> >> IE: hasAttribute("name") && getAttribute("name").length > 0 >> Safari: hasAttribute("name"); >> Firefox and Opera: no checking for @name >> >> Firefox and Opera seem like they have less check than Safari. But, are >> you saying that Safari's behavior is preferred over that because it's a >> little close to IE's. > > I seem to recall that someone from WebKit said a site relied on this > case when this was specified. But I could be mistaken. Thanks. -- MichaelReceived on Monday, 6 April 2009 23:16:28 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:29 GMT