Re: Final thoughts on <q> from Sam Kuper on 2008-10-30 (public-html@w3.org from October 2008)

From: Sam Kuper <sam.kuper@uclmail.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:06:17 +0000
To: "Daniel Glazman" <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Cc: "Justin James" <j_james@mindspring.com>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4126b3450810300706o4d7e8ebh6c6982dc5f8d380d@mail.gmail.com>

2008/10/30 Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>

> Deprecate it and I'm fine ; drop it and I disagree.
>

I think it's unlikely HTML 5 will mark *anything* as 'deprecated':

'Since HTML 5 has separate conformance requirements for authors and user
agents there is no longer a need for marking things "deprecated".' [1]

Regards,

Sam

[1]http://www.w3.org/TR/html5-diff/#backwards-compatible

Received on Thursday, 30 October 2008 14:06:53 UTC