2008/10/30 Justin James <j_james@mindspring.com> > > Frankly, since > <q> is so rarely used, and since no matter what happens (even the behavior > which I personally think would be a bad idea) is easily avoided via CSS, I > don't think it is worth discussing. Until it has been decided who will bear responsibility for specifying the default rendering of <q>, and what sort of spec for this they are expected to produce, I think the discussion remains open. Perhaps this would be a good juncture for Ian to step in with some feedback. Regards, SamReceived on Thursday, 30 October 2008 14:03:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:32:42 GMT