W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2008

RE: <q>

From: Justin James <j_james@mindspring.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:50:23 -0400
To: "'Daniel Glazman'" <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Cc: "'Sam Kuper'" <sam.kuper@uclmail.net>, "'HTML WG'" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <010f01c93a07$f694f8b0$e3beea10$@com>

Actually, yes, I *would* prefer that whenever possible. You write a spec for everyone to use, but refer to a spec source that probably 99% of developers have never accessed due to the cost.

J.Ja

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-html-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Daniel Glazman
> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 4:36 PM
> To: Justin James
> Cc: 'Sam Kuper'; 'HTML WG'
> Subject: Re: <q>
> 
> 
> I should also add that ISO standards are not available for free. Should
> we stop to reference them then ?
> 
> </Daniel>
Received on Wednesday, 29 October 2008 20:51:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:24 GMT