W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2008

Re: <q>

From: Thomas Broyer <t.broyer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:16:52 +0100
Message-ID: <a9699fd20810291216q4d411a39hb286f95fc310b8a6@mail.gmail.com>
To: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Sam Kuper <sam.kuper@uclmail.net> wrote:
> Let me re-emphasise: neither
> <p>"<q>I'm tired of this,</q>" he said.</p>
> nor
> <p><q>"I'm tired of this,"</q> he said.</p>
> are constructions that should be forced upon anyone who wishes to use the
> <q> element. They both feature redundancies, and it is not clear which is
> "correct" (which is one reason I think neither of them are).
> <p><q>I'm tired of this,</q> he said.</p>
>
> is a far more elegant solution, for the reasons expressed in my previous
> emails in this thread.

Er, which of the following is "correct"? (ok, no "redundancy" here, but still)
<p><q>I'm tired of this,</q> he said.</p>
or
<p><q>I'm tired of this</q>, he said.</p>


-- 
Thomas Broyer
Received on Wednesday, 29 October 2008 19:17:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:24 GMT