W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2008

Re: proposal to allow div, h1 .. h6 and section as children of list elements

From: Bruce Lawson <bruce@brucelawson.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:01:03 +0100
To: "Toby A Inkster" <tai@g5n.co.uk>, public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.ujitelcxu355il@bruce-pc>

On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 23:32:13 +0100, Toby A Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote:

<.. snip>

>
> As I understand it, these are referred to as "paragraphs" by those in  
> the legal profession, so surely <p> is a better element for the job than  
> <li>?

Thanks for looking at this, Toby.

They are referred to as paragraphs, yes -- but the whole document is an  
ordered list of paragraphs. Perhaps I should adjust my demonstration  
markup so that each <li> contains a <p> element that wraps the text, so  
that it better illustrates this.

>
> I think most of the cases your proposal covers can be solved by  
> adjusting the markup, especially with the <ol start> and <li value>  
> attribute.

But I'd rather not use the start and value attributes; I don't want to  
hardcode the numbers in the markup.


> That having been said, I do see the merit in a grouping element within  
> lists, but not one which allows arbitrary content. Something equivalent  
> to <tbody> within tables: the content model within the <tbody> is as if  
> the <tbody> wasn't there.

That would be useful, too - but why invent another element when we have a  
grouping element -- the <div> element? As I asked in my original proposal,  
what is the objection to allowing groups of arbitrary content with a  
<div>? It seems to me that unless there is a compelling reason to forbid  
something, then it should be permissible

bruce
Received on Friday, 24 October 2008 13:01:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:38:58 UTC